CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 183 APPLICANT TD RESPONDENT KH The Tribunal orders: KH is to pay $14,472.75 to TD on or before 9 May 2023. Reasons 1. TD purchased a [ute] for $22,000 from KH after seeing it advertised on [website]. TD saw KH’s advertisement on [website] for the sale of his [ute]. She asked KH about the condition of the ute via a quest...
...the goods does not pass until the conditions are met. 6. I find that one of the terms of the contract between the parties was that property in the signs would not pass until the signs had been paid for. 7. D Ltd provided a quote dated 7 June 2023 for the signs, which included under verandah light box panels, vinyl door stickers and rigid pvc covering strips. At the bottom of the quote CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 included a statement that unless otherwise agreed in writi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 742 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT SN LL The Tribunal orders: LL and SN must pay M Ltd $2,466.00 by 4pm on 17 January 2024. Reasons: 1. The applicant is a mortgage broker and arranged mortgage financing for the respondents with a third party lender. The respondents moved their mortgage finance to an...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 644 APPLICANT DN RESPONDENT IL Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. This order is to be emailed and posted to the parties. Reasons: 3. In August 2020 DN purchased a spa pool (‘pool’) from IL Ltd. IL Ltd supplied DN with a replacement pump in August 2022 after it failed. 4. Several months la...
...dog collar to CM trading as D Co within 7 days of receipt. Reasons 1. OB purchased a dog collar from CM for a “large strong dog” online for $72 including freight. The collar was manufactured by CM and received on or about 20th September 2023. The collar broke on the 17th November 2023 while in use. A new collar was purchased which is still in use. 2. On the 17th November 2023 OB advised CM of the break electronically and copied a photograph of the broken collar. On 22nd N...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 497 APPLICANT BI RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. When the train arrives at the [Town] station, the area gets busy with people disembarking, catching buses, and connecting with other sight seeing operations. It was busy in February this year when BI decided to take an ofte...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 506 APPLICANT J Ltd RESPONDENT UX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. J Ltd provide training services and courses in psychological first aid. It contacted UX, [redacted], and offered its service to develop a psychological first aid course to meet the needs of UX. 2. The parties agreed that HS, director of J Ltd, should t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 73 APPLICANT UD RESPONDENT CE APPLICANT'S INSURER B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. At the hearing, UD was represented by his son CD. CD was the driver of the vehicle involved in a collision with CE. CD alleges he pulled up behind CE and was in traffic stopped on the [Street] in...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 221 APPLICANT BZ RESPONDENT OJ The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. For the avoidance of doubt, I record that the van remains the property of BZ, and she may deal with it as she sees fit. Reasons: 1. BZ purchased a [van] for $2,400.00 from OJ. 2. She inspected the vehicle before purchasing it. She dec...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 219 APPLICANT LL RESPONDENT XX The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim and counterclaim are dismissed. Reasons: 1. LL is claiming $8,033.25 for payment of work that he did on XX’s [ute] in February this year. 2. XX disputes that the payment is outstanding. He claims that he has paid LL $7,000.00 in cash,...