CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 326 APPLICANT SO RESPONDENT GU The Tribunal orders: GU is to pay SO the sum of $150.00 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. On 3 August 2022, the parties entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of a property at [Town] with a settlement date on 30 September 2022....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 74 APPLICANT KQ RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by KQ against M Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KQ purchased a 2018 Range Rover Sport car from M Ltd in January 2022 for $129,800.00. 2. Several months following the purchase KQ noticed that the car’s service light was on, indicating the car...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 716 APPLICANT UT RESPONDENT DU The Tribunal orders: 1. DU is to pay UT the sum of $400 by 31 January 2024. Reasons 2. In February 2022 UT purchased a mattress for a shared apartment in [Town]. The apartment was owned in quarter shares. The mattress cost $1,600. UT is now seeking to recover a ¼ of this purchase price from DU....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 713 APPLICANT KO RESPONDENT TC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KO purchased goods through [online] marketplace from TC. KO arranged a courier pick-up of the goods but says only some of the purchased goods were in the package TC provided to the courier. 2. KO says he is entitled to a refund of $160....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 298 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT C Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT CD APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) GN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 20 May 2022, temporary metal scaffolding erected to cover a second story roof top sw...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 136 APPLICANT LN RESPONDENT K Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT EU APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. LN and a K Ltd truck being driven by EU were involved in a collision at about 8.30am on 7 June 2022 on [Road]. LN alleges she was driving on a straight...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 630 APPLICANT PI RESPONDENT NQJ SECOND RESPONDENT XB The Tribunal orders: The claim is struck out. Background 1. In August 2019, PI was contacted by MX (a vet based in [Town]) to assist with de-stocking animals at a local farm owned by NQ. 2. NQ was elderly and in poor health. NQJ became involved due to concerns about...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 668 APPLICANT BV RESPONDENT JU The Tribunal orders: The Applicant’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. JU did not attend the hearing and did not provide any defence to the claim. The absence of a party does not prevent the hearing from proceeding. Section 42 of the Disputes Tribunal Act provides that where the case...
...RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: 1. The name of the respondent is amended to KN. 2. KN is to pay to QN the sum of $3,223.99 on or before 21 March 2024. Reasons: 1. FJ was the registered owner of a [vehicle] in September 2023. The car had been paid for by KI. FJ and KI had asked QN to collect the car from a mechanic for them while they were overseas. QN was looking after the car while they were away. 2. On the morning of 2 September 2023, the [vehicle] was pa...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 199 APPLICANT MN RESPONDENT LO The Tribunal orders: LO is to pay MN $2,000.00 on or before 9 April 2024. Reasons 1. On 2 November 2023 MN saw a [quad bike] advertised on [online] by LO and purchased it for $2,000.00. On 3 November 2023 he took it to a service agent for checking over and discovered it was a 2WD bike, not a 4WD. He sought an assessment from [motorcycle mecha...