Search Results

1. HI v BC Ltd [2024] NZDT 198 (28 March 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...the sale of her bakery business was as a going concern and was zero-rated for GST, and b. If BC Limited signs and returns the tax invoice by the specified date, BC Limited need not pay the amount ordered in Order 1. Reasons: 1. On 1 April 2023, HI sold her bakery business to BC Ltd. She says the sale was supposed to be as a going concern and therefore zero-rated for GST purposes. However, she says BC altered the written agreement to record that the sale was not as a going conce...

2. HC v HT [2024] NZDT 223 (21 March 2024) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...$10,000.00 was a loan given to him by HC to help him by his house. However, his position is that he was not required to repay the amount because: a. He had repaid $5,400.00 comprised of 2 payments into HC’s bank account of $400.00 on 23 February 2023 and $1000.00 on 1 March 2023, and that he arranged with his father to give HC a further NZ$4000.00 equivalent in cash after HC asked for money when he was in [country] getting married; and b. He had previously lent HC money, including...

3. KD & KX v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 533 (21 September 2023) [pdf, 184 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 533 APPLICANT KD APPLICANT KX RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: Introduction: 1. On the 21st of July 2022, KX and his sister KD were booked to fly from [City 1] to [City 2]. 2. KX and KD missed the flight and had to book a flight with [Airline] the following day. 3. Th...

4. HI v HD Ltd [2023] NZDT 85 (15 March 2023) [pdf, 105 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 85 APPLICANT HI RESPONDENT HF Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. HI had an account for supply of electricity with HF Ltd at her property at [Street]. 2. In August 2022 she moved to [Street]. HI said she intended HF Ltd to continue to supply her electricity at her new property. At the time HI had an...

5. KC v M Ltd [2023] NZDT 494 (3 October 2023) [pdf, 202 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 494 APPLICANT KC RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: KC is to pay $200.00 to M Ltd by 28/11/23. Reasons: 1. KC entered into a year long gym membership contract in September 2021. After moving to [City 1], she continued in her [City 1] gym then wished to pause or exit the contract as her employer instigated a work...

6. DX & QX v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 215 (27 April 2023) [pdf, 99 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 215 APPLICANT DX APPLICANT QX RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] The applicants, QX and DX, claim from T Ltd, represented by DT, compensation for what they consider a misleading building report prepared by DT. DT denies liability. [2] The essential facts were not in dispu...

7. AZ v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 268 (28 June 2023) [pdf, 179 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 268 APPLICANT AZ RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In May 2021 AZ engaged S Ltd as her property manager, for her house in [suburb], while she was [overseas]. The property was tenanted until 4 July 2022. After the tenants moved out S Ltd and AZ’s friend carried out a final inspect...

8. XN v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 273 (20 June 2023) [pdf, 198 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 273 APPLICANT XN RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The hearing is dismissed. Reasons 1. XN asked C Ltd to service his vehicle. Some weeks later he was cleaning the car and found a broken part of the glove box, a hole near the back, on the right-hand side. He also found signs of glue around the hole. XN rec...

9. TQ v EN [2023] NZDT 113 (2 June 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 113 APPLICANT TQ RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TQ bred [Dog], a [dog breed], and sold her to EN on 23 December 2021. The parties signed a contract which provided, at clause 5, that ‘The Buyer represents … that … Buyer will have the dog spayed or neutered by the age of six m...

10. BJ v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 82 (23 February 2023) [pdf, 143 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 82 APPLICANT BJ FIRST RESPONDENT T Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT K Ltd THIRD RESPONDENT BD The Tribunal orders: The claim is struck out against BD; and The claim is dismissed against T Ltd and K Ltd. Reasons 1. BD was struck out from these proceedings at the outset of the hearing as the Disputes Tribun...