(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 695 APPLICANT V Ltd RESPONDENT BS The Tribunal orders: BS is to pay V Ltd the amount of $26,318.75 on or before 23 January 2024. Reason 1. The dispute concerns insurance commissions and whether V Ltd can ‘clawback’ commissions from BS. BS was engaged as an independent contractor for V Ltd providing personal insurance to clients. Upon making a sale the insurer would p...
...certain entitlements, including professional fees and contingencies, that policyholders should have received. After that, T Ltd contacted EB who, having received legal advice, entered a settlement with T Ltd. The deed of settlement, dated 17 April 2023, was expressed, in summary, to be in full and final settlement of all the matters stated in cls 1.4 and 1.5 which included all claims, rights or entitlements in existence at the time or that might arise in the future. The deed was stated to...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 755 APPLICANT TL RESPONDENT TF Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 8 November 2023, TL contracted TF Ltd (herein TF) to move her household goods from [Town] to [City] on 2 December 2023 for $1,710.00. 2. The booking was made via [an online platform], which allows customers to chose from multiple part...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 740 APPLICANT BR APPLICANT SR RESPONDENT LD SECOND RESPONDENT BD The Tribunal orders: The claim and counterclaim are both dismissed. Reasons 1. The Applicants and the Respondents had discussed building a boundary fence. The Respondents thought agreement had been reached, but when building was about to start the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 157 APPLICANT DX and NS RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: X Ltd is to pay $24,722.70 to DX and NS on or before 9 June 2023. Reasons 1. DX and NS (‘the applicants’) purchased a new-build property at [Address] from X Ltd, having attended an Open Home at a nearby development ([Road 1]) because [Road 2] was still und...
...13. Mr M submitted an application to [Regional Council] on 1 December 2022. [Regional Council] (Harbourmaster’s Office) approved the new mooring on 5 December 2022. 14. N Ltd issued an invoice for $6,704.63. 15. On or around 9 February 2023 Mr M followed up with KB about payment of the invoice. KB offered to pay half of the invoice the next week and the balance over the next month. 16. On or around 12/13 February 2023, during Cyclone Gabrielle, B slipped her mooring and went...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 335 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim by X Ltd is dismissed. X Ltd is to pay U Ltd $8,418.54 on or before 5pm on Wednesday 22 March 2023. Reasons: 1. In March 2021, X Ltd (“X Ltd”) and U Ltd (“U Ltd”) entered into discussions regarding the provision of services by...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 750 APPLICANT UI APPLICANT I Ltd RESPONDENT S Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by UI in his personal capacity is struck out. 2. The claim against S Ltd is dismissed. 3. The claim against C Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UI filed this claim to seek recovery of two engines he...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 534 APPLICANT BN RESPONDENT MV SECOND RESPONDENT KT The Tribunal orders: 1. MV is to pay BN a total of $20,000.00 on or before 26 October 2023. 2. The claim against KT is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BN purchased a property from MV in February 2022. KT acted as the real estate agent on the sale. 2. A few months after set...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 22 APPLICANT HH APPLICANT HT RESPONDENT WT Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. WT Ltd is to pay HH and HT $25.00 each, being a total of $50.00 on or before 5pm on 28 March 2023. Reasons 1. HH and HT paid $65.00 each for a bottomless brunch at WT Ltd. They were told, after they ordered their first round of food, that...