CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 70 APPLICANT OO APPLICANT UI RESPONDENT QP SECOND RESPONDENT XP THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In October 2020, OO and UI purchased a property at [Address] from QP and XP. QP and XP’s agent was QD of M Ltd. OO understood that the prope...
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 342 APPLICANT CX and EB RESPONDENT TK The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. CX and EB engaged TK to carry out a pre-purchase house inspection, which was done in October 2021. The applicants moved into the property in December 2021 and, in June/July 2022, they noticed audible drips and leaks into their house in at least two places....
...evidence that he followed KH’s aftercare advice stringently. However, antibiotics were required, and DE suffered from minor complications. He claims that during this time, KH was very hard to contact and stopped answering calls. 4. In April 2023, DE went in to UC Ltd for crowns to be placed on the implants and was informed that one of the two implants had failed. On May 2, DE was sent an ‘implant consent form’ which he refused to sign as it had not been provided at the outse...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 733 APPLICANT DS RESPONDENT XT SECOND RESPONDENT UT COUNTER CLAIM APPLICANT S Ltd RESPONDENT DS The Tribunal orders: In respect of the claim XT is to pay $7,220.00 to DS by the 20th January 2024. The counterclaim by S Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. DS and XT and UT own adjoining properties. While DS was oversea...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 775 APPLICANT TL RESPONDENT OC Limited The Tribunal orders: OC Limited is to pay TL $21,150.00 by 4 January 2024. Reasons: 1. The claim relates to a house renovation that OC Limited completed for TL in 2018/19. She says a subcontractor painted the wrong product on the cedar cladding. As a result, she says she cannot simply re...
...install a sewer sleeve for a new Council sewer drain; b. Expose the stormwater mains for the Council; and c. A site scrape to prepare building sites and earthworks on the boundary of the properties. 5. B Ltd carried out work at the property in 2023. QT has paid B Ltd a total of $30,980.67 (in two payments of $13,310.00 on 1 February 2023 and $17,669.67 on 13 March 2023). 6. Since he filed his claim QT has refined his claim. The issues to be resolved are: a. Was QT liable to pay...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 359 APPLICANT HI RESPONDENT UD The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 29 June 2020, a severe storm struck [city] and heavy rain fell. During this event, a section of the bank behind HI’s house, which was partly on his land, and partly on UD road reserve, slipped. HI’s trailer was damag...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 259 APPLICANT BP RESPONDENT TD The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The counterclaim was withdrawn at the conclusion of the hearing. For clarity the counterclaim is also dismissed. Reasons: 1. BP agreed to buy TD’s boat for $135,000.00. BP paid a deposit of $13,500.00 and took possession of the...
...the sum of $10,000.00 on or before 31 July 2024. Reasons: 1. BN and HF engaged O Ltd to supply and install a portacom block of toilets at the [Hotel]. 2. The agreement was dated 25 October 2022, with an expected completion date of 30 April 2023. A deposit of $34,359.60 was paid to O Ltd and work started to obtain the necessary consents from the [Local Council]. 3. In January 2024 BN and HF cancelled the contract as no consents had been obtained and no building work had begun....
...Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. T Limited owns commercial premises at [redacted]. The premises were previously occupied by a bakery and produce business trading as [Company A]. 2. In December 2023 [Company A] ceased trading, and the company that owned the business ([redacted]) went into liquidation. 3. BN lives in [Town]. He saw that [Company A] had closed, and he was interested in establishing a food business at the site....