CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 624 APPLICANT TD Limited RESPONDENT SC Limited The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: SC Ltd is to pay $9557.92 to TD Ltd on or before 19 December 2023. Reasons 1. SC Ltd contracted TD Ltd to build a 50sqm deck at a coastal property where SC Ltd was doing extensive renovation work for the homeowners. SC Ltd had...
...pay the sum of $493.22 to MS by no later than 8 March 2024. Reasons: 1. MS and UM are neighbours with a shared driveway. MS’s property is lower than UM’s and is in a dip. 2. MS’s property flooded on three occasions during storms in 2023. MS claims the flooding was due to drains being blocked by vegetation, mud and scoria washed down from UM’s property. Any property damage was covered by MS’s insurer, however MS claims in the Disputes Tribunal to recover the cost of...
...details to W Ltd directly to enable payment on behalf of A Ltd). Reasons 1. BI and QA of A Ltd were the drivers involved in a minor motor vehicle collision in the right-turning bay at the intersection of [Street 1] and [Street 2] in October 2023. 2. QA was behind BI and his vehicle hit the rear of BI’s vehicle. QA says that BI stopped abruptly, and also that he had been hit from behind by another vehicle before he hit BI’s vehicle. He says that the other vehicle fled the scen...
...DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 344 APPLICANT TT RESPONDENT JN APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by TT and J Ltd against JN is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 20 June 2023 TT was driving her [vehicle] on the road between [Town 1] and [Town 2] when she came across a group of at least 12 cows on the road. TT pulled her vehicle towards the middle of the road so that it crossed what would be seen as the centre of...
...Tribunal. 4. ES filed his claim on 19 February 2024. He claims the sum of $33,016.00 (but limiting his claim to the maximum of the Tribunal’s jurisdiction being $30,000.00) being the cost to repair the damaged silo based on a quote dated 12 October 2023 from ED Ltd. 5. T Ltd filed a counter claim on 24 June 2024 for the sum of $6,595.25. They say that the claim by ES is time barred but if it is found to not be they say that they are entitled to the amount claimed being the amo...
...4. The net sale proceeds of the Property are currently being held on trust by [Law Firm], solicitors, pending the resolution of the dispute between the Ds and MF, and pending the division of relationship property between PD and MF. 5. On 11 June 2023, the Ds brought a claim against MF in the Tribunal claiming $27,791.97, being $24,000.00 of the net sale proceeds of the Property, legal fees of $3,375.00, and interest of $416.97 as at 28 February 2023 (based on the civil debt interest cal...
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 159 APPLICANT UE and QO RESPONDENT CO Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. This order should be read with that dated 27/10/23. 2. This dispute had its origins back in 2012 when the UE and QO’s (the applicants) home in [Street] suffered devastating and catastrophic damage in a natural disaster, a land s...
...The Tribunal orders: XX is ordered to pay TS the sum of $600.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 25 September 2024. Reasons: 1) There was no appearance of the respondent, and the hearing proceeded in her absence. In March 2023 the applicant, and the respondent, entered into an arrangement for the respondent to board with the applicant, and his wife. This was for an agreed board of $200.00 per week. 2) There was a written and signed record of the parties’ ag...
Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 369 APPLICANT TQ RESPONDENT UM SECOND RESPONDENT CM THIRD RESPONDENT FOURTH RESPONDENT HT N Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. TQ obtained a jetski from UM. It had been advertised as having a fully rebuilt engine. 2. Shortly after obtaining the jetski, he too...
...218 APPLICANT I Ltd RESPONDENT EX The Tribunal orders: EX is to pay $943.62 to I Ltd on or before 24 April 2024. Reasons 1. EX engaged I Ltd to provide drain unblocking services at his tenanted property in early April 2023. I Ltd attended on 7 April, flushing, clearing and cutting roots in the line. EX paid the invoiced amount of $517.50. 2. I Ltd attended site again ten days later, after the tenant advised EX there was another blockage – on that occas...