Search Results

1. SB v QD [2024] NZDT 91 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...sale by him would not attract the commission fee. 6. SB claimed he had set up an exhibition for QD and that QD had promised that the paintings then in the gallery and particularly [The painting] were to remain in the exhibition until 21 March 2023, when the exhibition was due to end. However, QD denied there was any exhibition. He claimed that the only preparation was that a couple of paintings including [The painting] had been moved to a different wall, but that there was no promoti...

2. EI & MQ v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 485 (19 June 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...remainder of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. EI and MQ purchased a [Queen mattress], split queen base, a mattress protector, [brand] silk pillow including delivery and installation (‘the bed package’) for $6,000.00 in September 2023 from M Ltd. The bed package was delivered on 17 October 2023 and by the 27 October 2023 EI and MQ observed stains on the base, rips and worn areas on the mattress. M Ltd agreed to provide a complete replacement of the bed package. 2....

3. Q Ltd v SN & TT [2024] NZDT 628 (19 August 2024) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...proceed. […] The fee is usually based on the aforementioned hourly rate and hours of work but generally not more than $1,600 each. 3. BS submitted home loan applications on behalf of SN and TT. 4. [Bank] made a home loan offer on 24 July 2023. The [Bank] offer was made on a maximum loan to value ratio (LVR) of 70%, on the grounds that TT was on a work visa. 5. SN and TT did not accept the [Bank] offer. They ceased using BS, and went with another insurance broker. 6. Q Ltd...

4. LN v N Family Trust and others [2023] NZDT 503 (18 September 2023) [pdf, 251 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 503 APPLICANT LN RESPONDENT N Family Trust SECOND RESPONDENT IE THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT FO THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT SD The Tribunal orders: 1. IE, FO and SD as Trustees of the N Family Trust are to pay LN $2,688.32 on or before 16 October 2023. 2. If there is any additional cost (abov...

5. BT v WN Ltd [2023] NZDT 14 (19 April 2023) [pdf, 111 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 14 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT WN Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT LB The Tribunal orders: LB is to pay directly to BT the sum of $47.72 on or before 27 July 2022. This order determines both the claim and counterclaim. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. All parties appeared at...

6. CT v DF Ltd [2024] NZDT 167 (25 March 2024) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...t/a ID is to pay to CT $1,042.34 on or before 5:00pm on Friday 17 May 2024. Reasons 1. On 17 August 2021, CT bought a Hybrid battery from DF Ltd t/a ID for $2,651.20. The battery came with a 2 year/60,000km warranty. On or around 22 January 2023, CT reported faults with the battery and took the car in to ID for investigation. The car had done 43,000km since the battery was installed. On 23 January 2023, ID offered a ‘one off repair’ deal and made CT sign a waiver. However, a...

7. DQ Ltd v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 217 (5 March 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...for $30,000.00 which it says is the losses it incurred as a result of the drains being laid in an incorrect place. Procedural issues. 4. This matter has been part heard and adjourned on many occasions, at the last hearing on the 21 November 2023 L Ltd confirmed that it had received an insurance pay out for the losses it incurred because of the concrete entering the pipes. Section 28 of the Disputes Tribunal Act provides that when an Applicant (L Ltd is an applicant in the counterc...

8. CL v TU [2024] NZDT 82 (1 February 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...APPLICANT CL RESPONDENT TU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. CL paid J Ltd $21,853.22 for electrical work and materials. J Ltd has not done the electrical work or provided any materials, and in May 2023 it was placed in liquidation. CL seeks an order that TU, the sole director and shareholder of J Ltd, is liable to pay him $21,853.22. 2. TU did not attend the hearing. At the first hearing I spoke to the liquidator of J Ltd who provided t...

9. US v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 776 (16 October 2024) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 776 APPLICANT US RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay US $5,000.00 on or before 6 November 2024. Reasons 1. US purchased a spa from B Ltd in 2017. In December 2023 a technician came to look at a fault with the spa heater and discovered the frame of the spa was entirely rotten. B Ltd gave a repair estimate of $6,000.00 plus the cost to uplift the spa with a crane and load it onto a truck, to take it awa...

10. KH v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 420 (4 March 2024) [pdf, 142 KB]

    ...the respondent then forwarded the applicant an email referring to an attached “quote”, being a more fully explained estimate of the option one cost; g) the document described as a “quote” in the email, was a document dated 8 September 2023 titled in bold and upper case “[Freight estimated costings]” and contained several lines of costs and concluded with an “Estimated Grand Total” of $26,846.39; h) having received this estimate described in the respondent’s emai...