...APPLICANT QU RESPONDENT UQ APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: UQ is to pay J Ltd $6,420.80 by 31 July 2024. Reasons 1. QU and UQ were involved in an accident on [road] on 13 June 2023. 2. QU stopped at a pedestrian crossing. UQ failed to stop and hit the rear of QU’s [vehicle]. 3. QU was insured with J Ltd. 4. QU’ vehicle was repaired at a cost of $6,420.80. 5. The claim seeks that amount from UQ....
...that the $4,000.00 from the subcontractor would be better spent on a completely new structure. She responded that she and the neighbour would like to proceed with fixing the retaining wall and would leave the fence to a later date. 10. On 11 April 2023, an engineer provided [Builder] with a detailed plan for a timber pole retaining wall for the driveway. The design allowed for a vehicle ‘surcharge’. X Ltd paid for the engineering fees of $1,897.50 for designing and certifying the ret...
...Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 546 APPLICANT ZX RESPONDENT UE The Tribunal orders: The claim by ZX against UE is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 14 November 2023, ZX entered into a contract to purchase a [vehicle] (the car) for $18,000.00 from UE. The car had been advertised on [website]. 2. ZX drove the car from [City 1] back to [City 2] and proceeded to drive it on short trips to work. On...
...services she had provided for Visa applications that were not approved. She explains that she had not invoiced these throughout the relationship as M Ltd had refused to pay for the first declined VISA application when she charged for it in February 2023, and she did not want to jeopardise the relationship. IQ now claims $9,092.50 for the applications that she made that were not approved made up as follows: a. Invoice 0068 dated 26 July 2024 ($575 incl GST deducted payment made)...
...this once the kitchen panels were provided. 16. As per the terms of an agreement between the parties, the Applicant had to make a payment in the amount of $7,763.89 in two tranches: $2,295.07 being the first tranche to be paid on 31st January 2023 and $5,468.82 being the second tranche to be paid in two equal instalments o 15th February and 28th February 2023. I note that the second tranche relates to the kitchen panels provided which are the subject of this claim. 17. The...
...BD and SO met with LL’s father, MN, who runs the bar. They say a trial period was discussed and MN told them that a $10,000.00 deposit would be needed for a trial period. That amount was paid to LL’s bank account on the evening of 8 December 2023. 4. Earlier that day, a written contract had been sent to BD and SO and they immediately noticed that a price of $25,000.00+GST was recorded in the contract. They rang MN and apparently agreed verbally that the price would be $20,000.00...
...The Tribunal orders: The claim by TM against B Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. TM purchased a unit in [suburb] in 2016. At that time, TM also entered into an agreement with B Ltd for house insurance. Following inquiries by B Ltd, during 2023, B Ltd cancelled the insurance because TM’s unit is a “stacked” unit and should be insured as part of the whole building not as an individual building. TM now brings a claim against B Ltd for a refund of his premium payments over the y...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 693 APPLICANT FT RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: O Ltd is to pay FT $3,084.00 by 3 September 2024. Reasons: 1. Between July 2023 and May 2024, FT worked for O Ltd as a sales agent under an independent contract. She says she has not been paid her share of the commission due on the sale of [address]. 2. SI, the director of O Ltd, advised the Tribunal she would not atten
...which included issuing PS1’s and a PS4. KI is the company director for L Ltd. QI paid $1,725.00 to L Ltd under invoice I000455 dated 20 March 2019, and $920.00 under invoice I000547 dated 3 July 2019. 2. QI says that allegations came to light in 2023 that KI has been fraudulently signing engineering reports over several years. 3. QI now seeks an order from the Tribunal for $2,735.00 being $2,645.00 for the fees paid to L Ltd, and $90.00 filing fee for this claim. QI says that L...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 502 APPLICANT NP RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NP had a collision in her car, a [vehicle], in December 2023. NP had insured her car with B Ltd, who arranged for the repairs to be done. NP was due to collect her car after it had been repaired on 17 January 2024, but B Ltd advised her the repairer had found some other issues with the car. The ca...