Search Results

1. DG & J Ltd v BM [2024] NZDT 327 (23 April 2024) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 327 APPLICANT DG RESPONDENT BM APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: BM is to pay $4,224.10 to J Ltd on or before 12 May 2024. REASONS 1. On 28 October 2023 DG had attended the speedway in [Town]. Upon leaving, DG drove along the gravel road leading from the speedway track to the intersection with the road, following a vehicle driven by BM. BM stopped on the gravel road at the intersection of...

2. TL v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 541 (9 July 2024) [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...satisfied the respondent has been properly notified of the hearing, and therefore I will proceed to consider the claim in its absence. [2] The applicant seeks a refund a deposit paid to the respondent to secure a vehicle purchased on 5 September 2023, $2,050.1 The applicant selected a vehicle from the respondent’s yard and paid a deposit to secure it. Once the applicant’s loan was approved the applicant return to the respondent’s premises to uplift his vehicle. On returning to the y...

3. CN & MN v KN & W Ltd [2024] NZDT 521 (7 August 2024) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...reference to a vendor’s obligation to disclose known defects to purchasers (under cl 7 and cl 9 of the Agency Agreement). KN notes that the boundary/encroachment issue was not proven until the District Court made an order adjusting the boundary in 2023. 19. KN also says that [address 2] was sold by public auction, and the information pack provided to prospective purchasers included an aerial photograph of the known boundaries delineated which ought to have alerted a purchaser to a p...

4. EZ & UC v HQ & LQ [2024] NZDT 424 (15 May 2024) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 424 APPLICANT EZ and UC RESPONDENT HQ and LQ The Tribunal orders: 1. HQ and LQ are to pay EZ and UC $15,846.45, on or by 7 June 2023. Reasons 2. EZ and UC purchased their home from HQ and LQ in 2018. The purchase was made by tender, with the offer accepted on 16 May 2018 and the sale was concluded on 31 May 2018. The sale was made using the ADLS 4th edition sa

5. DD v B Ltd [2022] NZDT 258 (20 December 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 258 APPLICANT DD RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay $700.00 to DD on or before 30 January 2023. Reasons 1. DD paid $2700.00 to B Ltd (‘B LTD’) in April 2018 as 50% part-payment for installation of a balustrade. Work was to commence in about 6 weeks. However, DD then requested a further quotation for an awning to accompany the

6. B Ltd v OQ & ST [2024] NZDT 15 (23 January 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...or has paid part of the debt, in which case the time limit starts from the date the debt was acknowledged in writing or the date of the last payment (s47 of the Act). CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 5. At the hearing on 12 September 2023 KS said he believed he had evidence of the acknowledgement of the debt by OQ. OQ denied there had been any such acknowledgement. The matter was adjourned to allow KS to respond with further information and / or submissions as to whether the...

7. SD v MT [2024] NZDT 57 (19 February 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...[2024] NZDT 57 APPLICANT SD RESPONDENT MT APPLICANT'S INSURER B Ltd The Tribunal orders: MT is to pay the sum of $1,484.75 to B Ltd on or before Monday 11 March 2024. Reasons: 1. On 5 May 2023, there was a collision between SD’s [vehicle] and MT’s car on the roundabout at the intersection between [Road 1] and [Road 2]. MT stopped to let SD onto the roundabout. After SD entered the roundabout, he needed to slow due to congestion...

8. QU v TW [2024] NZDT 311 (14 May 2024) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 311 APPLICANT QU RESPONDENT TW APPLICANT'S INSURER Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QU claims that in November 2023 TW collided into her parked car. Her car had a market value of $10,500.00, and was written off, and she reached a settlement with her insurer receiving payment of $9,900.00, after a $600.00 deduction for the excess. 2. QU initially...

9. KT v P Ltd [2024] NZDT 382 (14 June 2024) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 382 APPLICANT KT RESPONDENT P Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Around March/April 2023 KT purchased a 2021 [vehicle] for $30,500.00 from P Ltd. KT now wishes to return the vehicle and seeks a refund of $30,000.00 being the maximum jurisdiction of the Tribunal as he says he was not advised it is a type of hybrid car termed a ...

10. TN v KM [2024] NZDT 106 (28 February 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

    ...replacing carpet in a room that KM had occupied in his, TN’s, house. TN also claims the cost of professional carpet cleaning and materials. [2] TN said that KM had occupied a bedroom in his house, as a boarder, for about a year until November 2023. It had been agreed that KM would clean his own bedroom and bathroom. TN said that he had had no access to KM’s room, as KM was either in it or, if he was out or away, the room was locked. [3] At the end of about a year, around the time...