Search Results

1. N Ltd v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 341 (25 May 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 341 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay N Ltd the sum of $100.00 on or before 20 May 2024. Reasons: 1. On 14 November 2023 N Ltd lent a company car to an employee, allowing them to drive it for personal use, outside of their working hours. The driver parked the car in a carpark managed by T Ltd. That carpark had a maximum stay of 15 minutes, which the driver...

2. FH & EN v KS & G Ltd [2024] NZDT 756 (15 November 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...NZDT 756 APPLICANT FH APPLICANT EN RESPONDENT KS SECOND RESPONDENT G LtdG Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. FH and EN purchased a composting toilet system from G Ltd. In 2023 FH and EH raised concerns about capacity issues, and G Ltd agreed to supply them with 2 additional composting bins on agreed terms. FH and EH say the new bins they received are different from the original models and are not fit for purpos...

3. DF v QT [2024] NZDT 474 (11 June 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...QT are neighbours. DF is a permanent resident in [Town]. She and her husband have lived at [address 1] for many years. QT and EJ own [address 2]. They purchased the property several years ago and use it as a holiday home. 2. Until February 2023 there was a boundary fence between the properties. DF built all the boundary fences around her property approximately twenty years ago. They were close-boarded fences, and they were in good condition until [the storm] struck. The fences w...

4. B Ltd v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 482 (17 May 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...The Tribunal orders: M Ltd is to pay the sum of $10,863.00 to B Ltd on or before 31 May 2024. Reasons: 1. This dispute arises apparently as a result of email hacking, more formally known as business email compromise (BEC) fraud. On 14 August 2023, B Ltd issued an invoice to M Ltd for $24,725.00 for demolition work, due on 28 August. The invoice was emailed to M Ltd via [accounting software]’s messaging service. The accompanying message stated, “Please note our bank details have...

5. LG v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 411 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...with the boat [OG] will fix what we agree on to be satisfactory or a full refund of $5,000 is applicable within 48 hours of [LG] viewing.” 2. The boat arrived later than originally anticipated. LG viewed the boat with his partner on 19 December 2023 and decided that it was not what they wanted. He advised OG in an email that he would not purchase the boat and requested a refund. OG said the deposit was non-refundable. LG claimed to be refunded his deposit. 3. The issues to be de...

6. XM v MK & NK [2024] NZDT 559 (5 August 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...strongly he never attempted to reverse the payment until April when NK was causing access problems. 6. MK states what XM says is correct and is between the brothers and should never have impacted XM. He states he and NK discussed selling in October 2023 and he knew NK was reluctant to sell the boat. He states he offered for NK to buy him out but NK could not because he could not raise a loan. MK states NK was well aware the boat was being sold because he messaged him on 22 February 202...

7. SI v NI & DI [2022] NZDT 218 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...[2022] NZDT 218 APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT NI SECOND RESPONDENT DI The Tribunal orders: a. The claim against NI was withdrawn at the start of the hearing and is dismissed. b. DI is to pay to SI $6,500.00 by 16 January 2023. Reasons: 1. Today’s hearing was a rehearing of the dispute which means it starts afresh from the beginning. 2. SI and DI attended today’s hearing with the assistance of their support persons (NI and IB). 3. SI purch...

8. TH & UH v DM & MT [2022] NZDT 262 (5 December 2022) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...to sell Lolo. 10. In this case, I accept that some steps were taken to try to sell him. I also accept that DM had not had a puppy returned before and genuinely had Lolo’s interests at heart when she found a suitable local, who had been on the 2023 waitlist to rehome him, and pay for his desexing and microchipping, and as a consequence she likely lost a future sale. 11. However, despite these steps, on balance I find that the breeder breached the contract as I find it did not tak...

9. KH v KN [2022] NZDT 241 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 241 APPLICANT KH APPLICANT YM RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: KN is to pay KH and YM the amount of $3,153.40 on or before 16 January 2023. Reason 1. On 15 February 2022 the applicants entered into an agreement to purchase the respondent’s property in [suburb]. The property consisted of 3 separate dwellings. Settlement was 20 May 2022. The applicants are claiming $2...

10. SX v Q Ltd & TY [2024] NZDT 239 (9 February 2024) [pdf, 106 KB]

    ...the management contract. SX subsequently requested that the inspection reports and property rental records be forwarded to the new management company but Q Ltd repeatedly failed/refused to do so. 14. The day before the first hearing on 5 October 2023, Q Ltd made a substantial written submission, which included multiple inspection reports that SX had never seen before, in a format inconsistent with previous reports. 15. SX files this claim seeking $25,524.32 for a partial refund of...